I’d like to think that my sense of direction is quite good.
I wanted to go back to the dam and estuary I visited a few days ago ( I hear there are peregrine falcons at the dam, and even though I work with Lucy all the time, I can’t count her). A morning bird excursion with Katdoc got rained out, so I thought I would roll the dice and see if the afternoon would be drier. I thought of a new way to head down to the estuary…Rt. 222.
I saw that Rt. 222 ends right at the estuary, and I knew where it started, up at Rt. 50. So I thought, “Hey. I’ll go down 222 and maybe it will be shorter.”
*Insert maniacal laughter from Kathi, who sees just where this is going*
Well, as it turns out, 222 goes right where I thought it did, but it took twice as long. And it’s not a short trip to start with, anyway.
Rt. 222 meanders through farmland, up and down hills…I was laughing out loud about it eventually.
I did get the opportunity to see some interesting road names.
“Bethel Hygiene” was a good one…but the one that made me almost run off the road:
“LAYCOCK CUT OFF”. I kid you not.
I didn’t get any life birds today, but it was a nice trip.
American kestrel: 2
American crow: 15
Turkey/black vulture: a lot
Pigeon: 50?
Pied-billed grebe: 6
Ring-billed gull: 20
Eastern bluebird: 4
A rest area near Point Pleasant has some info about Ulysses S. Grant, who was born across the street. And a list of all the presidents born in Ohio.
I found my first “wild” pellet…presumably an owl’s. I couldn’t really tell what the animal had been, but it had dark fur. It was a BIG pellet.
And when I turned it over with my shoe, I found a pretty orange spider.
I watched and watched the pigeons on the dam, waiting for a peregrine to come rocketing out of the sky and pick one off.
You are here.
January 14, 2007 at 12:54 am
Susan,
You could have asked Geoff for directions. Then you no doubt would have seen several states west of the Mississippi on your way to the dam.
January 14, 2007 at 2:04 am
That is an odd spider. Sure do wonder what the owl had been eating, don’t you?
January 14, 2007 at 8:46 am
Cool owl pellet and spider! And interesting road names. . . Sounds like you had fun!
January 14, 2007 at 9:01 am
I have never, ever seen a spider I would call “pretty”.
So you took the long way but at least you can laugh about it! That’s what I like about you, no matter what happens, it’s a party.
January 14, 2007 at 11:35 am
It’s all about the ride!
I think that might be coyote ca-ca the way it’s all twisted at the ends and strung together. It looks like solid fur because the other matter has been rained off of it. That looks like a kernel of corn in it, which would be an odd thing for an owl to ingest.
January 14, 2007 at 11:51 am
Pretty spider? Oh, I don’t think so. Shudder.
January 14, 2007 at 9:10 pm
Ms. Science Chimp:
You think so? It was more compact when I found it, and rolled it around quite a bit with my shoe before taking pictures. And the thing that looks like corn is a bone (maybe a scapula). And the rest was full of whole bones, maybe from rats. This thing was lying about 3 deet from the bank, not under a tree, so maybe a coyote had a movement…it looked big enough to be from a GHO.
January 14, 2007 at 9:53 pm
The thing that makes me think it’s turds is that there are so many of them linked together. Is this something you see in owl pellets? I think of owl pellets as one unit, usually with blunt, not twisted ends, and not linked like sausages. Now I’m getting really graphic. Sorry. It is after dinnertime, right?
January 14, 2007 at 10:35 pm
Susan I think you should have brought the coyote poop home and dissected it on the kitchen table.
January 14, 2007 at 10:46 pm
Mary:
Thanks…I do try to make things into a party if it’s not going my way. But I haven’t always been like this. It’s taken alot of work to get my mind in “happy gear”.
Laura:
You are right. I should have.
Julie:
You’re not being too graphic. I like you being you. I have seen our owl pellets fall apart like this thing, if it’s fresh and extra large ( I have been collecting them for my education box).
This really looked like a pellet to me. But I would be thrilled to find coyote scat. I would take that home!
January 14, 2007 at 11:01 pm
Peeee-yew. You’d better watch out, or a box with a Ziploc bag is gonna arrive on your doorstep, and it isn’t going to be Whitman’s chocolates. All we need here is Katdoc, explaining caecal anatomy… Science Chimp,signing off on the scat vs. pellet controversy!
January 17, 2007 at 8:27 am
Oh man, I was just going to say that that looked like coyote poo. Maybe the reminents of a tasty rabbit?